Friday, 25 November 2005
Of controversies and verbal diarrhoea
I really wish I'd seen the match. I want to know if Rahul Dravid and Greg Chappell were indeed booed off the field. If they were, then I suppose one might be forgiven for concluding that the Eden Gardens curator was "out to get them".
The Eden Gardens crowd hasn't shown itself in the best light over the last ten years :/
As an aside: I'd have like to seen Greg Chappell giving the finger to the crowd.
As another aside: I feel sorry for the anchor chap on Turning Point who has to put up with Sherry's bluster. Wouldn't want to be him...
Thursday, 24 November 2005
Hurray!
I would've commented on that post itself, but can't email from office :-/
Once again, hurray!
Tuesday, 22 November 2005
This is a test post
Oh, and it feels like AMI all over again, what with higher-ups fearing your deserting the company..
Monday, 21 November 2005
Good call, Gaurav, but...
While deciding to accept that overs in cricket consist of 6 legitimate deliveries is a step in the right direction, I still have a bone to pick with DD about they way they instantly cut to the ads after the last ball of an over has been bowled, in the process unceremoniously cutting off the commentator mid-sentence. [Whether Ranjith "never-disagree-with-fellow-commentator" Fernando or Ravi "left-the-bat-like-a-tracer-bullet" Shastri actually have anything of value to say is immaterial..]
However, what REALLY gets my goat is "Fourth Umpire". When I reached that point in Gaurav's post where he talks about that generally pointless exercise [haven't seen Anjum Chopra in action yet, but (sadly enough) my namesake Srikkanth and Wassan do say the same things over and over again], and noticed that he was picking on the opening sequence, I read on with bated breath to see if he would pick up the GLARING error in it. He did not :-(
A game of cricket already has 4 [FOUR] umpires. Charu "I-wish-I-had-Mandira-back" Sharma is not the 4th. The 4th umpire is the poor guy who trots out some time shortly after the 37th holding a box of balls [cricketing ones] in his hand and stands timidly to one side while the on-field umpires and batsmen and captain of the fielding team pull out their hair [from their heads] over which ball [again, cricket] to use as a suitable replacement for the one that's gone all green [not blue]. If only he'd added this little bit, Gaurav "insert-random-behavioural-statement-here" Sabnis' post would have been complete.
Incidentally, I was also going to comment on the umpire being Billy, and not Brent Bowden, but common sense prevailed and I Googled a bit to see that he is indeed Brent "Billy" [Fraser] Bowden. So much for deliberate nitpicking :-/
Sunday, 23 October 2005
OTOH
Another interesting tidbit in that article - not is is A. Saxena the "President, Legal and Compliance Cell", he's also "Head of Corporate Communications". I tell you, that man is multi-faceted.
In related news, the animated .GIF in this post is simply tooo funny. Kinda makes me think of Bill Gates if he ever read Slashdot....
More MSM crap
Their coverage of the IIPM brouhaha is no exception.
I actually stooped to registering on the site so that I could provide them with the following 'feedback':
First Mr. Vivek labels Indian bloggers as a "bitchy, self-indulgent, incestous network" and then accuses THEM of name-calling and taking potshots at others?
And still the mainstream media continues to ignore the real issue. Has it ever occurred to you that maybe, just MAYBE, the bloggers aren't doing this imply to drive traffic to their blogs? That there might be something to these 'allegations'? And that maybe the so-called 'real journalists' should be doing the work here?
Saturday, 22 October 2005
An enumeration of the general idiocy
What next? Taking out supari on the bloggers in the forefront of this issue?
Sheesh. Grow up.
An enumeration of the fraud
- Institute generally lies about everything in its ads (or would they prefer the term 'misrepresenting'?
Office blues
Some interesting things have turned up..Press Talk led me to this link about fake Indian universities i.e ones that have been blacklisted by the UGC All the indignation aside, that list has some really funny names, which in itself should alert any person with any reasonable amount of intelligence about their dubious nature.
- Commercial University Ltd., Daryaganj, Delhi
I mean, come ON people! They're practically flaunting their intentions!
- National University of Electro Complex Homeopathy, Kanpur
Right. As opposed to other instis only indulging in the pedagogy of Magneto Simple Homeopathy?
- United Nations University, Delhi
Like I said - come ON people! I really cannot believe anybody would fall for that one. But then again, if all of Ekta Kapoor's teleserials rack up the TRPs, despite being exactly the same, anything's possible in our country...
- Vocational University, Delhi
Fakest name. Ever. Even faker than the word 'fakest'.
- Raja Arabic University, Nagpur
Nothing unusual about that one. Just included to show off the secular nature of my blog..
- Handwriting University India, No 16 Church Road, Basavaugudi,Bangalor-4
Wow, an entire university for penmanship alone? That sounds like a univ I could use...
- Indian Institute of Planning and Management
Oh wait, that's not on the list. Silly me, I wonder how I could've made that mistake..
There's also a reference to the 'Mal Practices Alert regarding American University of Hawaii'. Sounds neat :)
Come to think of it, when I said 'any person with any reasonable amount of intelligence', I probably wasn't thinking. These kinds of shady places don't really target those kind of people. They're more likely after the gullible types who want a degree appended to their names at any cost. Kautiliya has written at length about 'trapping suckers'.
Coming back to my opening paragraph, one of the few good things about slaving one's [admittedly large] posterior off in software development is that you get to see that even Vinod or Goach can't get out of this one!